Week 5
Week 5 Discussion
Shukura Martin
Colorado Technical University
Scenario Planning and Traditional Forecasting:
When it comes to making sense of the future, two fundamental concepts, scenario planning and traditional forecasting, take center stage. These two approaches offer distinct lenses through which we can peer into the complexities of what lies ahead.
Scenario Planning:
Imagine a strategic tool that invites us to think differently about the future. This is where scenario planning steps in. Rather than attempting to predict the future with a single, pinpoint forecast, scenario planning encourages us to envision multiple possibilities. It's about crafting narratives, each based on a unique set of assumptions and variables. These narratives help us prepare for a multitude of potential outcomes. Scenario planning is all about flexibility, adaptability, and readiness for the unknown. It excels in its ability to guide us through uncertain terrains, identify and mitigate risks, and foster innovation by exploring diverse possibilities. However, it's important to acknowledge that it does come with a cost – it demands time, effort, and resources, and even then, it cannot provide a crystal-clear view of the future.
Chermack (2004) , "In his article 'Improving decision-making with scenario planning' (Chermack, 2004), the author identifies four critical contributors to decision failure: bounded rationality, the tendency to consider only external variables, the stickiness and friction of information and knowledge, and mental models that include decision premises or policies. These issues, when present independently or in combination, can lead to the ultimate form of decision error, which Chermack refers to as 'folly.' Bounded rationality refers to the limitations in human cognitive capabilities, which can hinder decision makers from fully analyzing and understanding complex situations. Furthermore, the tendency to focus solely on external variables, such as market trends or economic indicators, can result in a narrow perspective that neglects internal factors within an organization. Chermack emphasizes that information and knowledge can often become 'sticky' within an organization, leading to difficulties in sharing and accessing crucial data. This information friction can impede effective decision-making. Moreover, mental models, which encompass decision premises and policies, may create a cognitive bias that reinforces existing beliefs and prevents decision makers from considering alternative scenarios. To address these decision-making challenges and prevent the occurrence of folly, Chermack advocates for the use of scenario planning. Scenario planning enables decision makers to break free from the confines of bounded rationality by exploring multiple plausible futures. It encourages a holistic approach by considering both external and internal variables. Additionally, scenario planning facilitates the identification and resolution of information friction within organizations. Finally, it promotes the development of new mental models that can accommodate changing circumstances and ensure more robust decision-making.
Traditional Forecasting:
Now, let's shift our focus to the traditional forecasting method. In contrast to the qualitative and exploratory nature of scenario planning, traditional forecasting relies heavily on historical data and mathematical models. It's a data-driven approach that aims to predict future events or trends based on what's happened in the past. Traditional forecasting excels in scenarios where historical data provides a reliable indicator of future outcomes. It's efficient and cost-effective, making it a popular choice for short-term predictions. However, it has its limitations. Traditional forecasting tends to struggle when confronted with complexity and uncertainty. It's less adaptable to sudden shocks or unforeseen events, and it often seeks a single, deterministic answer, which may not hold true in a world filled with variables (GLOBIS Insights, 2023).
Comparison:
In essence, scenario planning and traditional forecasting are like two different tools in a craftsman's workshop. Scenario planning, with its qualitative, exploratory approach, thrives in environments filled with uncertainty, offering a flexible way to manage risks and encouraging creative thinking. On the other hand, traditional forecasting is the trusty measuring tape – precise and dependable when historical data can paint an accurate picture of the future. The choice between these two methods isn't about one being superior to the other; it's about selecting the right tool for the task at hand. It's about recognizing the nature of the challenge you face and deciding whether you need the adaptability of scenario planning or the efficiency of traditional forecasting to illuminate your path into the future.
Reference:
Comments
Post a Comment